开彩彩票网固然这其中约略莫得好莱坞式的戏剧性格节-开云彩票(中国)官方网站

发布日期：2025-08-03 02:06    点击次数：196

全球视线开彩彩票网

每周从全球各大与公益慈善或社会翻新界限相干的媒体或专科网站，去浏览发现当下正在发生的案例和正在想考的不雅点，然后翻译整理成篇，传达第一手的极新资讯。栏目但愿不错通过著述的视角或者表述，为会员伙伴们提供启发、翻开视线。

问&答：小镇慈好行状靠近的挑战和契机是什么？

明尼苏达州北部的一个慈善组织，但愿匡助农村社区毫无顾虑田主张并愚弄他们领有的庄重当然和社会资源，以创造更好意思好的昔日。

起首：

张开剩余97%

The Daily Yonder/逐日远处

作家：

Adam B. Giorgi

著述《Q&A: What Are the Challenges and Opportunities of Small-Town Philanthropy?/问&答：小镇慈善行径靠近的挑战和契机是什么？》发布在The Daily Yonder/逐日远处上，这是一家提供关系好意思国农村地区的新闻、挑剔和分析的媒体。这是一篇问答式的报谈，采访了布兰丁基金会的高档农村宣传司理珍妮弗·贝维斯。著述先容了布兰丁基金会在援助乡村社区方面的责任，特地是该基金会怎样通过资助明尼苏达州的微型乡村社区，匡助责罚方位问题，以罢了振兴与发展。他们专注于资源有限的小镇，简化肯求历程并提供资金援助，使这些社区能够自主责罚问题，同期鼓动社会效益和历久影响。

The small town of Grand Rapids, Minnesota has found itself in the headlines over the years due to its connection to Judy Garland and a certain pair of stolen ruby slippers. That’s the kind of tale that big-city journalists, true-crime podcasters, and Hollywood screenwriters just can’t help themselves over, but, to no surprise of our readers, there’s way more to say and appreciate about Grand Rapids. Among these is that it is home to one of the only rural-based and rural-focused foundations in the whole U.S. This is an area of particular interest to us, as captured in some of our prior interviews. I’m additionally excited to tell you about it because the Blandin Foundation is less than an hour away from my hometown and the communities where I grew up.

明尼苏达州的小镇大大水城因其与朱迪·嘉兰及一对被盗的红对峙鞋的筹商，多年来多次登上新闻头条。这么的故事总会眩惑到大城市的记者、果真坐法题材播客主执东谈主和好莱坞编剧的关注。但毫无疑问，咱们的读者一定知谈，大大水城的魔力远不啻于此。其中一个值得关注的亮点是，它是全好意思少数几家专注于农村地区、并由农村社区主导的基金会所在地。这话题一直是咱们的特地关注点，正如咱们之前的一些采访所展现的。此外，我尤其期待向巨匠先容布兰丁基金会，因为这家基金会距离我的家乡和我成长的社区不到一小时车程。

Jennifer Bevis is the Senior Rural Advocacy Manager at Blandin, and her experiences and perspectives concerning rural Minnesota were quite familiar and rang true to me. There may not be as much drama as a Hollywood caper, but her work brings with it some great stories too.

珍妮弗·贝维斯是布兰丁基金会的高档农村宣传司理，她对明尼苏达州农村的训戒和办法让我倍感老练，也深有共识。固然这其中约略莫得好莱坞式的戏剧性格节，但她的责任相同滋长着很多精彩的故事。

Enjoy our conversation about the charms of living in rural Minnesota, some of the unique challenges and opportunities of small-town philanthropy, and a big picture view on how we might reach a more prosperous future for rural people and places.

请赏玩咱们对于明尼苏达州农村生存魔力的对话，探讨小城镇慈好行状所靠近的私有挑战与机遇，并从宏不雅角度瞻望怎样为农村社区和住户创造愈加茂密的昔日

珍妮弗·贝维斯是布兰丁基金会的高档农村倡导司理。该基金会是全好意思为数未几的安身于农村、专注于农村发展的基金会之一。

图片起首：珍妮弗·贝维斯

亚当·乔尔吉，《逐日远处/The Daily Yonder》（以下简称《逐日远处》）

For those who are unfamiliar, tell us a little bit about the Blandin Foundation, its home territory, and the history there.

对于不太了解的东谈主，您能否浅易先容一下布兰丁基金会、它所干事的地区以及基金会的发展历程？

珍妮弗·贝维斯

We’re one of the few rural-based, rural-serving private foundations in the country, and we’ve been supporting rural communities for over 80 years.

咱们是全好意思为数未几的安身农村、干事农村的私东谈主基金会之一，80多年来一径直力于于援助农村社区的发展。

Our story goes back to Charles K. Blandin, who owned the paper mill in Grand Rapids, Minnesota, and founded the foundation in 1941. His vision was to create a foundation that could adapt over time to meet changing needs, and that’s something we take seriously to this day.

咱们的故事不错回想到查尔斯·K·布兰丁，他曾是明尼苏达州大大水城一家造纸厂的所有这个词者，并在1941年创立了布兰丁基金会。他的愿景是竖立一个能够跟着时代推移而挽救，以安闲约束变化的需求的基金会，这亦然咱们于今仍在认真对待的事情。

Right now, we’re focused on building community wealth, rural placemaking, and strengthening the capacity of people and organizations in communities under 5,000 people. We also look at big challenges like rural inequities tied to place, race, and class.

目前，咱们的重心是开采社区金钱、鼓动农村方位营造，以及增强东谈主口不到5000的社区当中的个东谈主与组织的智力。同期，咱们也关注一些要害挑战，比如与地域、种族和阶层相干的农村不对等问题。

Most of our work centers around Grand Rapids and Itasca County, where 60% of our funding stays, but we also support rural Minnesota communities statewide. At nearly 3,000 square miles, Itasca County is roughly the size of Yellowstone National Park, so it’s no small task. It’s all about listening, learning, and responding to what rural people say they need—and helping bring those ideas to life.

咱们的大部单干作皆围绕大大水城和伊塔斯卡县张开，咱们60%的资金皆用于这两个方位，但咱们也为明尼苏达州全州的农村社区提供援助。伊塔斯卡县的面积接近3000平方英里，差未几是黄石国度公园的大小，因此这不是一项小任务。咱们要作念的即是倾听、学习和恢复农村住户的需求，并匡助他们将这些想法变为现实。

《逐日远处》

How did you come to your work in rural philanthropy and what’s your personal connection to the areas the foundation serves?

您是怎样运转从事农村慈善责任的？您个东谈主与基金会干事的地区有什么筹商？

珍妮弗·贝维斯

I grew up as a “country kid,” surrounded by the joys of rural life. My mom, raised on a farm, wanted her family to experience the same, so my parents bought an old farmstead. While my dad, a plant pathologist, worked with crops and farmers in western Minnesota’s Red River Valley, my mom gardened, and my sisters and I cared for animals. I especially loved my chickens, the flaming prairie sunsets, and the retired farm couples who became like adopted grandparents—dropping by for coffee, asking about my track meets, and attending my band concerts.

我是一个典型的“乡村孩子”，从小被乡村生存的乐趣所包围。我姆妈在农场长大，她但愿她的家东谈主也能体验相同的生存，是以我父母买了一个老农场。我的父亲是别称植物病理学家，在明尼苏达州西部的红河谷从事农作物和农民责任，我的母亲则负责园艺责任，我和姐姐们则护理动物。我特地可爱我的小鸡、火红的草原日落，还有那些退休的农场老婆，他们就像我的养祖父母一样，连续来喝咖啡，征询我田径比赛的情况，还插足我的乐队音乐会。

Instead of heading to the city for college, I stayed rooted in rural Minnesota, attending a campus overlooking the Minnesota River Valley. Small-town life in St. Peter balanced perfectly with the broader perspectives I gained in class.

我并莫得采取去大城市读大学，而是扎根于明尼苏达州的乡村，在一所不错鸟瞰明尼苏达河谷的校园里学习。圣彼得的小镇生存与我在课堂上获取的更浩繁视线，造成了好意思满的均衡。

I took my first job in a new rural place – the deep woods and rugged rocks of northern Minnesota’s Iron Range. I loved telling the stories of people building businesses, schools, and towns. Their grit, ingenuity, and passion — whether running a café or conducting particle physics research in the Northwoods—showed me I’d made the right choice in embracing rural life.

我的第一份责任是在一个新的农村地区，位于明尼苏达州北部铁矿区的深山老林和凹凸岩石中。我可爱阐扬东谈主们开采企业、学校和城镇的故事。他们的勇气、灵敏和护理，非论是辩论咖啡馆仍是在北林区进行粒子物理学研究，皆向我讲明，我采取拥抱农村生存是正确的决定。

Now, my family and I live in the Grand Rapids area along the Mississippi River, another rural community that’s welcomed me with open arms. Each of these communities has gifted me with special people and places. Like many who choose rural living, I’m drawn to the closeness to nature, the space for independence, and the deep sense of belonging that comes from being part of a close-knit community.

当今，我和家东谈主住在密西西比河滨的大大水城地区，这是另一个护理迎接我的农村社区。每一个社区皆赋予了我疏淡的东谈主和事。和很多采取乡村生存的东谈主一样，我也被这里亲近当然的环境、独当一面的空间，以及算作一个细未必营的社区一员所带来的深深包摄感所眩惑。

《逐日远处》

As you noted, Blandin’s roots are in north central Minnesota, serving a collection of small towns not far from the Mississippi headwaters, but its programs and strategies also extend to rural Minnesota at large. Why is looking at rural Minnesota in this broader way important? And what’s the landscape look like in terms of philanthropic attention across rural Minnesota? I noticed in one of your recent grant announcements that rural areas in Minnesota receive less than 8% of philanthropic funding, a good deal smaller than their nearly 23% share of the state’s population.

正如您所指出的，布兰丁基金会的根基在明尼苏达州中北部，干事的是围聚密西西比河起源的一些小镇，但基金管帐划和策略也膨大延长到了整个明尼苏达州的农村地区。为什么以这种更浩繁的视角来看待明尼苏达州的农村地区很攻击？而在农村慈好行状的关注度方面，整个明尼苏达州的情况又是奈何的？我精通到，在你们最近发布的一项资助公告中，明尼苏达州农村地区获取的慈善资助不到8%，而这些地区的住户约占全州东谈主口的23%，这个比例彰着偏低。

珍妮弗·贝维斯

I’m stating the obvious here, but under-resourced rural communities are present all across America – not just in rural Minnesota. Food, transportation, medical and news deserts in rural America are the hallmarks of decades of outdated fiscal policies.

我在这里说的可能是不言而谕的，但资源不及的农村社区遍布全好意思，而不单是只是明尼苏达州的农村。好意思国农村的食物、交通、医疗和新闻沙漠是几十年来过期财政政策的显贵特征。

Broadening our view beyond our local giving area makes these impacts crystal clear, from northern Minnesota’s mining and forestlands to the farming, wind energy and manufacturing areas in the central and south of the state. Rural is NOT a monolith. Each community has its own unique identity and DNA. Yet we see and hear from rural people seeking to spark change and rebuild resilience that navigating most sources of support is complicated and time-consuming. Most funders assume applicants regularly work with grantwriters, and that communities can seek or raise significant matching funds. These types of parameters do not play to rural’s strengths of strong, trusted social connections, can-do attitude, and crafting community-specific solutions on a shoestring.

将咱们的视线扩大到当地捐赠区域以外，这些影响就一目了然了，从明尼苏达州北部的矿区和林地，到州中部和南部的农业、风能和制造业地区。农村地区绝非一个调和的合座。每个社区皆有其私有的身份和特征。关联词，咱们从寻求变革并重建规复力的农村住户那里听到的信息是，大部分获取援助的道路皆相等复杂和费时。大多数资助者皆默许肯求东谈主连续会与资助肯求撰写东谈主合作，何况社区能够寻求或筹集到可不雅的配套资金。这些要求条目无法进展农村的上风，即强盛、值得相信的社会关系、积极逾越的魄力以及在有限资金下制定顺应社区需求的责罚决策。

Yet we also know that rural places have significant philanthropic power. The University of Minnesota conducted an important study earlier this year chronicling what will be the largest generational transfer of wealth in the history of the country. Since rural communities skew older than urban areas, the transition is happening faster in rural places.

关联词，咱们也知谈，农村地区领有雄壮的慈善力量。本年早些时候，明尼苏达大学进行了一项攻击研究，研究纪录了将成为好意思国历史上最大一笔代际金钱摇荡的过程。由于农村社区的东谈主口老龄化进程高于城市地区，农村地区的金钱摇荡速率更快。

The study estimates that $61 billion in wealth will change hands in the next 10 years alone. If rural communities capture even a tiny portion of that – say 1-5% – for rural grantmaking and endowments – and apply these funds to local nonprofit and philanthropic use, we could significantly benefit local arts, recreation, crisis centers and other critical community needs.

该研究算计，仅在昔日10年内，就将有610亿好意思元的金钱发生摇荡。要是农村社区能从中获取一小部分（比如1-5%）用于农村资助和捐赠基金，并将这些资金用于当地的非谋利组织和慈好行状，咱们就能极大地惠及当地的艺术、文娱、危险中心和其他的攻击社区需求。

If invested in new endowments over two decades, the captured pool could support grantmaking in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Nonprofits and their communities could leverage those dollars to support new workforce housing construction, develop major nonprofit capital projects and help lower-income residents launch new businesses.

要是这些资金在二十年内被投资到新的捐赠基金中，所积蓄的资金池不错援助数亿好意思元的资助。非谋利组织偏激社区不错愚弄这些资金援助新建的劳能源住房、开发要害非谋利本钱相貌，并匡助低收入住户启动新的企业。

尽管明尼苏达州的农村地区领有近23%的东谈主口，但获取的慈善资金却不到该州的8%。

图片起首：布兰丁基金会

《逐日远处》

What are some of the unique challenges – and opportunities – for foundations serving rural communities? And what might they teach us about trying to build more momentum for rural philanthropy?

对于干事于农村社区的基金会来说，有哪些私有的挑战和机遇？它们可能会给咱们带来什么启示，匡助咱们为农村慈好行状积蓄更多的能源？

珍妮弗·贝维斯

One of the biggest challenges is the continual flow of requests for support that exceeds our available resources, money and time. We know we never have everything we would need to fulfill every ask.

最大的挑战之一是约束涌来的援助请求，这些请求远远超出了咱们现存的资源、资金和时代。咱们知谈，咱们历久无法安闲每一个需求。

Challenges we see in rural people and places hit even harder. We know from local studies that demand for rural leadership is three times higher in the nonprofit sector and 25 times higher in government than in urban areas. The “role fatigue” of people stretched thin in leadership can dent our spirits and make us wary of volunteering. But with just a little help, the per capita impact of change in a small community can be greatly amplified. Yet those multilayered responsibilities also spur rural people to take on new roles, because they realize that they ARE “the someone” who gets things done for their community.

咱们在农村社区和住户中看到的挑战愈加严峻。咱们从当地的研究中了解到：在非谋利界限，农村地区对引导力的需求是城市地区的三倍，而在政府部门，这一需求则是城市的25倍。由于引导力的掣襟露肘，导致很多东谈主堕入了“变装疲困”，这不仅会疏忽咱们的斗志，还会让咱们对志愿干事产生违反心扉。然而，惟有有一丝点的匡助，一个小社区里的每个东谈主的篡改，就能产生雄壮的影响。关联词，这些多重职守也激勉着农村东谈主去承担新的变装，因为他们通晓到他们即是阿谁为社区作念事的“东谈主”。

Around the office, we call it “for us, by us” philanthropy. It’s community-informed. Community-centered. Community-specific. We’re continually amazed by the practical, workable, effective solutions shared with us. They come from a place of wisdom about the family contexts, economic realities and closely-held dreams people have to make their community a place where people can live with dignity and feel welcome – no matter how small your community. The power and poignancy of seeing that work happen every day, right where you live and work, gives rural philanthropy an immediacy, relevance – momentum –that’s hard to top.

在咱们的办公室里，咱们称之为“为咱们，由咱们”的慈好行状。它是由社区提供信息、以社区为中心，何况针对具体社区的。咱们约束被那些共享给咱们的、切实可行的且行之有用的责罚决策所惊艳。这些决策源于东谈主们对家庭布景、经济现实和深藏心中的欲望的知悉与灵敏积蓄，其筹算是让社区成为一个充满尊容和包摄感的家园，非论其限制大小。每天在我方生存和责任所在的方位，亲目击证这些篡改的发生，其力量和感染力赋予了农村慈好行状一种无可比较的径直性、现实酷爱和推能源。

《逐日远处》

Blandin recently rolled out a round of grants helping Minnesota’s smallest communities — with populations under 5,000 people — address a wide variety of local needs. What was the inspiration behind that program and what are some of the community projects it has supported? The announcement noted that something as simple as installing a door for a municipal office could make a big difference in these places.

布兰丁基金会最近推出了一轮资助筹算，来匡助明尼苏达州东谈主口不及5000东谈主的微型社区责罚千般当地需求。该筹算背后的灵感是什么？它援助了哪些社区相貌？公告中提到，即使是为市政办公室装配一扇门这么浅易的举措，也可能在这些社区带来雄壮变化。

珍妮弗·贝维斯

During the pandemic, we were overwhelmed with responses to grants targeted to communities with populations under 3,000. We expected up to 100 requests totaling $1 million. We fielded 324 requests for $24 million.

在疫情手艺，咱们收到了大批针对3000东谈主以下社区的资助肯求。咱们本来预计最多会收到100份肯求，总金额约为100万好意思元。成果推行收到了324份肯求，肯求总金额达2400万好意思元。

It was good insight into the incredible need in our small communities and also their dreams and innovation.

这让咱们深远体会到微型社区的雄壮需求，同期也看到了他们的欲望与翻新精神。

Informed by that overwhelming response and new data that showed a profound disparity in rural philanthropy, our leadership and trustees have staked out new priorities for the Blandin Foundation in the areas of Small Communities and Rural Placemaking. Small communities often do not have the resources or staff to search for and apply for grants, so we made the system as simple as possible.

鉴于这一利害的反响和新数据显露农村慈好行状存在雄壮各别，咱们的引导层和董事会为布兰丁基金会树立了新的优先标的，聚焦于微型社区和乡村的方位营造。微型社区无为莫得资源或东谈主员来寻找和肯求资助，因此咱们尽可能简化了系统。

The grant application we received from Richville – population 78 – was just like small towns are: plain spoken and conveyed with a can-do attitude. Leslie Lee, Richville’s city clerk, wrote this in her grant application.

咱们收到了来自里奇维尔（东谈主口78）的资助肯求，正如小镇的特质一样：指天画地，充满了乐不雅逾越的魄力。里奇维尔的布告官莱斯莉·李在她的资助肯求中这么写谈：

“Our goal is very simple. We wish to build a wall with a door. The goal of this project is to give the city an office space. This will make us more available to the community and enable us to safeguard the city’s business in a designated place.”

“咱们的筹算很浅易。咱们但愿建一面墙，并装一扇门。这个相貌的办法是为城市提供一个办公室空间。这将使咱们更容易为社区干事，也能为市政治务提供一个挑升的场所，以便妥善治理。

This is not a request for hundreds of thousands of dollars. It did not take a team of people or consultants to submit it. But this small and seemingly simple request – for a door and some basic office equipment – gives the city of Richville something that pound for pound is just as important as some of our biggest grants: it gives them the power to design their own future.

这不是一笔数十万好意思元的资助肯求，也不需要一支团队或照顾人来提交。但这个看似浅易的小请求：一扇门和一些基本的办公设备，却为里奇维尔提供了与咱们最大资助相貌相同攻击的东西：它赋予了他们设计我方昔日的职权。

We have learned that with a modest amount of money and a little support, towns like Richville can do incredible things. The key is respecting their own unique identity. It means meeting communities where they are at, rather than imposing someone else’s ideas and structure on them.

咱们了解到，凭借少许资金和一些援助，像里奇维尔这么的城镇也能作念出令东谈主咋舌的变化。要道在于尊重他们我方的私有身份。这意味着要凭据社区的推行情况提供匡助，而不是把别东谈主的想法和结构强加给他们。

It also helps fight the narrative of “rural decline” and brings visible change and enhances community engagement.

这也有助于抵挡“农村败落”的说法，带来可见的变化，并增强社区参与感。

As a staff, we can’t talk about Richville and the 71 other communities awarded grants through the Small Communities and Rural Placemaking program without breaking into grins, and tears. It’s the type of community-based philanthropy we’re convinced works. We’re also excited that since 2022 our grant funds have reached more than 100 new communities. Their requests provide insight into the needs and dreams of small-town Minnesota, like a digital literacy hub, new grandstands and speakers at pow-wow grounds, and updating a community center’s stove, tables and chairs and adding space for a food pantry. Having a functioning stove might seem insignificant from a conventional philanthropic perspective. But that equipment allows a community center—likely one of the town’s few civic institutions—to host the functions and events that bring community members together to address the challenges they face. Our grants staff considers these types of multiplier factors in their grant review, and program evaluation. We need to measure not just what gets completed but also the things that the community then uses that project to do in the future.

谈起里奇维尔和其他71个通过“微型社区和农村方位营造筹算”获取资助的社区，咱们的责任主谈主员皆会忍不住笑出声来，以至流下眼泪。这恰是咱们投诚有用的、以社区基础的慈善方式。相同令咱们感到繁荣的是，自2022年以来，咱们的资助资金已惠及了100多个新社区。这些社区的请求为咱们提供了对于明尼苏达州小镇需乞降欲望的庄重知悉，比如数字扫盲中心、约聚步地的新看台和扬声器，以及更新社区中心的炉子、桌椅，加多食物银行的空间。从传统慈善角度来看，领有一台平常运转的炉子似乎微不及谈。但有了这些设备，社区中心（可能是该镇为数未几的民众机构之一），就不错进展功能、举办各式行径，将社区成员聚积在整个，共同应答他们所靠近的挑战。咱们的资助责任主谈主员在审查资助和评估相貌时，还会研讨这些类型的倍增效应。咱们需要斟酌的不单是是已完成的相貌，还要评估社区怎样愚弄这些相貌作念更多的事情。

《逐日远处》

Your title is Senior Rural Advocacy Manager, so I want to give you a chance to do some advocating, to give voice to your rural people. With the soapbox and the megaphone at hand, what are your hopes for rural places in 2025 and beyond? Taking the big picture view, what will it take to get to the vibrant, sustainable, equitable rural futures envisioned by Blandin and other advocates?

你的头衔是高档农村宣传司理，是以我想给你一个契机，让你作念一些宣传，为你的农村东谈主民发声。有了演讲台和扩音器，您对2025年及以后的农村地区有什么盼望？从大局起程，怎样才能罢了布兰丁基金会和其他倡导者所想象的充满活力、可执续、刚正的农村昔日？

珍妮弗·贝维斯

I want rural places to be confident in what and who they are. Clear-eyed and honest about the challenges right under our noses. To unapologetically claim the valuable natural and social resources we have, and put them to work to our advantage. To resist the momentum of the many stereotypes that aim to box us into spaces that don’t fit, and hinder our ability to see ourselves accurately and act in our best interests. To have courage through change, and the seeds of hope for the future.

我但愿农村地区对我方的定位和身份充满信心。澄清而本分大地对咫尺的挑战。毫无顾虑田主张咱们领有的庄重当然和社会资源，并让它们为咱们所用。遏抑各式刻板印象的势头，这些刻板印象会将咱们放胆在不安妥的空间中，破裂咱们准确通晓我方并袭取顺应自己利益的步履。敢于篡改，播下对昔日的但愿种子。

Reaching toward the future we envision will take mutual respect, at all levels. Among people in each community, so we’re clear on where we’re headed and why, who’s good at what, and how together we move forward. Between communities, so we see the patterns that link us, share a view of a collective future and build a strong sense of regionalism to guide our future decisions. And across the alleged rural/urban divide, so the regions of our state contribute their all, in service to a Minnesota that is more than the sum of its parts.

要罢了咱们想象的昔日，需要各个层面的互相尊重。在每个社区的东谈主们之间，咱们要明确我方将要走向那边，为什么走那条路，谁擅长什么，以及怎样联袂共进。在社区之间，咱们要看到将咱们筹商在整个的模式，共享对集体昔日的看法，并竖立强烈的地区通晓，以率领咱们昔日的决策。跨越所谓的城乡差距，咱们州的各个地区皆孝顺出我方的一切，为明尼苏达州干事，让明尼苏达州高出其各个部分的总额。

As one of the guardians of Blandin Foundation’s voice, I love that I get to recognize and surface the mosaic of rural life, to bridge gaps and shed light on issues that often go unnoticed – particularly at the intersection of race, place and class. If I’ve helped make something invisible visible, and shared stories that aren’t just heard, but understood and acted on – it’s been a good week.

算作布兰丁基金会声息的看管者之一，我很欢娱能够通晓和揭示农村生存的方方面面，弥合差距，揭示连续被刻薄的问题，尤其是在种族、地域和阶层的交织处。要是我匡助东谈主们看到了一些看不见的东西，共享的故事不单是是被东谈主们听到，而且是被东谈主们领悟并付诸步履，那么这即是好意思好的一周。

要道句翻译

方位营造是一种辩论、设计和治理民众空间的多方面模式。方位营造愚弄当地社区的资产、灵感和后劲，旨在创造能够改善城市活力和促进东谈主们健康、幸福和福祉的民众空间。那么方位营造的英文是什么？

Placemaking

place n. 场所；方位

翻译、撰稿：丁适于（杭州市基金会发展促进会）

发布于：浙江省